Guzzle is an open source PHP HTTP client. In affected versions the Cookie
headers on requests are sensitive information. On making a request using the https
scheme to a server which responds with a redirect to a URI with the http
scheme, or on making a request to a server which responds with a redirect to a a URI to a different host, we should not forward the Cookie
header on. Prior to this fix, only cookies that were managed by our cookie middleware would be safely removed, and any Cookie
header manually added to the initial request would not be stripped. We now always strip it, and allow the cookie middleware to re-add any cookies that it deems should be there. Affected Guzzle 7 users should upgrade to Guzzle 7.4.4 as soon as possible. Affected users using any earlier series of Guzzle should upgrade to Guzzle 6.5.7 or 7.4.4. Users unable to upgrade may consider an alternative approach to use your own redirect middleware, rather than ours. If you do not require or expect redirects to be followed, one should simply disable redirects all together.
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
---|---|---|---|
Guzzle | Guzzlephp | * | 6.5.7 (excluding) |
Guzzle | Guzzlephp | 7.0.0 (including) | 7.4.4 (excluding) |
Guzzle | Ubuntu | kinetic | * |
Guzzle | Ubuntu | lunar | * |
Guzzle | Ubuntu | mantic | * |
There are many different kinds of mistakes that introduce information exposures. The severity of the error can range widely, depending on the context in which the product operates, the type of sensitive information that is revealed, and the benefits it may provide to an attacker. Some kinds of sensitive information include:
Information might be sensitive to different parties, each of which may have their own expectations for whether the information should be protected. These parties include:
Information exposures can occur in different ways:
It is common practice to describe any loss of confidentiality as an “information exposure,” but this can lead to overuse of CWE-200 in CWE mapping. From the CWE perspective, loss of confidentiality is a technical impact that can arise from dozens of different weaknesses, such as insecure file permissions or out-of-bounds read. CWE-200 and its lower-level descendants are intended to cover the mistakes that occur in behaviors that explicitly manage, store, transfer, or cleanse sensitive information.