CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-36344

Unquoted Search Path or Element

Published: Aug 16, 2022 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
9.8
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

An unquoted search path vulnerability exists in JustSystems JUST Online Update for J-License bundled with multiple products for corporate users as in Ichitaro through Pro5 and others. Since the affected product starts another program with an unquoted file path, a malicious file may be executed with the privilege of the Windows service if it is placed in a certain path. Affected products are bundled with the following product series: Office and Office Integrated Software, ATOK, Hanako, JUST PDF, Shuriken, Homepage Builder, JUST School, JUST Smile Class, JUST Smile, JUST Frontier, JUST Jump, and Tri-De DetaProtect.

Weakness

The product uses a search path that contains an unquoted element, in which the element contains whitespace or other separators. This can cause the product to access resources in a parent path.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Atok_medical_2Justsystems**
Atok_medical_3Justsystems**
Atok_pro_3Justsystems**
Atok_pro_4Justsystems**
Atok_pro_5Justsystems**
Hanako_police_5Justsystems**
Hanako_police_6Justsystems**
Hanako_police_7Justsystems**
Hanako_pro_3Justsystems**
Hanako_pro_4Justsystems**
Hanako_pro_5Justsystems**
Homepage_builder_20Justsystems**
Homepage_builder_21Justsystems**
Homepage_builder_22Justsystems**
Ichitaro_government_10Justsystems**
Ichitaro_government_8Justsystems- (including)- (including)
Ichitaro_government_9Justsystems**
Ichitaro_pro_3Justsystems**
Ichitaro_pro_4Justsystems**
Ichitaro_pro_5Justsystems**
Just_calc_3Justsystems**
Just_calc_4Justsystems**
Just_calc_5Justsystems**
Just_focus_3Justsystems**
Just_focus_4Justsystems**
Just_frontier_3Justsystems**
Just_government_2Justsystems**
Just_government_3Justsystems**
Just_government_4Justsystems**
Just_government_5Justsystems**
Just_jump_8Justsystems**
Just_jump_classJustsystems**
Just_jump_class_2Justsystems**
Just_medical_2Justsystems**
Just_medical_3Justsystems**
Just_medical_4Justsystems**
Just_medical_5Justsystems**
Just_note_3Justsystems**
Just_note_4Justsystems**
Just_note_5Justsystems**
Just_office_2Justsystems**
Just_office_3Justsystems**
Just_office_4Justsystems**
Just_office_5Justsystems**
Just_pdf_3Justsystems**
Just_pdf_4Justsystems**
Just_pdf_5Justsystems**
Just_police_2Justsystems**
Just_police_3Justsystems**
Just_police_4Justsystems**
Just_police_5Justsystems**
Just_school_6Justsystems**
Just_school_7Justsystems**
Just_smile_6Justsystems**
Just_smile_7Justsystems**
Just_smile_8Justsystems**
Just_smile_class_2Justsystems**
Shuriken_pro_6Justsystems**
Shuriken_pro_7Justsystems**
Tri-de_dataprotectJustsystems**

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References