CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-41946

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

Published: Nov 23, 2022 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
5.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Ubuntu
LOW

pgjdbc is an open source postgresql JDBC Driver. In affected versions a prepared statement using either PreparedStatement.setText(int, InputStream) or PreparedStatemet.setBytea(int, InputStream) will create a temporary file if the InputStream is larger than 2k. This will create a temporary file which is readable by other users on Unix like systems, but not MacOS. On Unix like systems, the systems temporary directory is shared between all users on that system. Because of this, when files and directories are written into this directory they are, by default, readable by other users on that same system. This vulnerability does not allow other users to overwrite the contents of these directories or files. This is purely an information disclosure vulnerability. Because certain JDK file system APIs were only added in JDK 1.7, this this fix is dependent upon the version of the JDK you are using. Java 1.7 and higher users: this vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.0. Java 1.6 and lower users: no patch is available. If you are unable to patch, or are stuck running on Java 1.6, specifying the java.io.tmpdir system environment variable to a directory that is exclusively owned by the executing user will mitigate this vulnerability.

Weakness

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Postgresql_jdbc_driver Postgresql 42.2.0 (including) 42.2.27 (excluding)
Postgresql_jdbc_driver Postgresql 42.3.0 (including) 42.3.8 (excluding)
Postgresql_jdbc_driver Postgresql 42.4.0 (including) 42.4.3 (excluding)
Postgresql_jdbc_driver Postgresql 42.5.0 (including) 42.5.0 (including)
Postgresql_jdbc_driver Postgresql 42.5.0-rc1 (including) 42.5.0-rc1 (including)
CEQ 2.13.2-1 RedHat jdbc-postgresql *
Red Hat build of Quarkus RedHat *
Red Hat build of Quarkus 2.7.7 RedHat jdbc-postgresql *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat postgresql-jdbc-0:42.2.14-2.el8 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat postgresql-jdbc-0:42.2.27-1.el9 *
Red Hat Fuse 7.12 RedHat jdbc-postgresql *
Red Hat Satellite 6.12 for RHEL 8 RedHat candlepin-0:4.1.20-1.el8sat *
Red Hat Satellite 6.13 for RHEL 8 RedHat candlepin-0:4.2.13-1.el8sat *
Red Hat Virtualization 4 RedHat ovirt-ansible-collection *
Red Hat Virtualization 4 RedHat ovirt-engine *
Red Hat Virtualization 4 RedHat postgresql-jdbc *
RHINT Camel-K-1.10.1 RedHat jdbc-postgresql *
RHINT Camel-Q 2.7-1 RedHat jdbc-postgresql *
RHINT Debezium 2.1.4 RedHat postgresql-jdbc *
Libpgjava Ubuntu bionic *
Libpgjava Ubuntu kinetic *
Libpgjava Ubuntu lunar *
Libpgjava Ubuntu mantic *
Libpgjava Ubuntu trusty *
Libpgjava Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Libpgjava Ubuntu xenial *

Extended Description

There are many different kinds of mistakes that introduce information exposures. The severity of the error can range widely, depending on the context in which the product operates, the type of sensitive information that is revealed, and the benefits it may provide to an attacker. Some kinds of sensitive information include:

Information might be sensitive to different parties, each of which may have their own expectations for whether the information should be protected. These parties include:

Information exposures can occur in different ways:

It is common practice to describe any loss of confidentiality as an “information exposure,” but this can lead to overuse of CWE-200 in CWE mapping. From the CWE perspective, loss of confidentiality is a technical impact that can arise from dozens of different weaknesses, such as insecure file permissions or out-of-bounds read. CWE-200 and its lower-level descendants are intended to cover the mistakes that occur in behaviors that explicitly manage, store, transfer, or cleanse sensitive information.

Potential Mitigations

  • Compartmentalize the system to have “safe” areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References