CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-4254

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection')

Published: Feb 01, 2023 | Modified: May 29, 2023
CVSS 3.x
8.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.8 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

sssd: libsss_certmap fails to sanitise certificate data used in LDAP filters

Weakness

The product constructs all or part of an LDAP query using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended LDAP query when it is sent to a downstream component.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Sssd Fedoraproject 1.15.3 (including) 2.3.1 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 RedHat sssd-0:1.16.5-10.el7_9.15 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat sssd-0:2.2.0-19.el8_1.3 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support RedHat sssd-0:2.2.3-20.el8_2.2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat sssd-0:2.2.3-20.el8_2.2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat sssd-0:2.2.3-20.el8_2.2 *
Sssd Ubuntu bionic *
Sssd Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Sssd Ubuntu focal *
Sssd Ubuntu trusty *
Sssd Ubuntu upstream *
Sssd Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References