CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-45693

Out-of-bounds Write

Published: Dec 13, 2022 | Modified: Jan 26, 2023
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

Jettison before v1.5.2 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the map parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted string.

Weakness

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Jettison Jettison_project * 1.5.2 (excluding)
MTA-6.2-RHEL-8 RedHat mta/mta-rhel8-operator:6.2.2-3 *
MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-hub-rhel9:6.2.2-2 *
MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-operator-bundle:6.2.2-5 *
MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-pathfinder-rhel9:6.2.2-2 *
MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-ui-rhel9:6.2.2-2 *
MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-windup-addon-rhel9:6.2.2-3 *
OCP-Tools-4.12-RHEL-8 RedHat jenkins-2-plugins-0:4.12.1686649756-1.el8 *
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 RedHat jettison *
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 for RHEL 8 RedHat eap7-jettison-0:1.5.2-1.redhat_00002.1.el8eap *
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 for RHEL 9 RedHat eap7-jettison-0:1.5.2-1.redhat_00002.1.el9eap *
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 on RHEL 7 RedHat eap7-jettison-0:1.5.2-1.redhat_00002.1.el7eap *
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 RedHat jettison *
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7 RedHat rh-sso7-keycloak-0:18.0.6-1.redhat_00001.1.el7sso *
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8 RedHat rh-sso7-keycloak-0:18.0.6-1.redhat_00001.1.el8sso *
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9 RedHat rh-sso7-keycloak-0:18.0.6-1.redhat_00001.1.el9sso *
RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers RedHat rh-sso-7/sso76-openshift-rhel8:7.6-20 *
RHINT Camel-Springboot 3.14.5.P1 RedHat jettison *
RHPAM 7.13.1 async RedHat *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu bionic *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu focal *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu jammy *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu kinetic *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu mantic *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu trusty *
Libjettison-java Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.

  • Be wary that a language’s interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.

  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.

  • Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application’s memory:

  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.

  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

  • Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].

References