CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-48303

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Jan 30, 2023 | Modified: May 30, 2023
CVSS 3.x
5.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

GNU Tar through 1.34 has a one-byte out-of-bounds read that results in use of uninitialized memory for a conditional jump. Exploitation to change the flow of control has not been demonstrated. The issue occurs in from_header in list.c via a V7 archive in which mtime has approximately 11 whitespace characters.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Tar Gnu * 1.34 (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat tar-2:1.30-6.el8_7.1 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support RedHat tar-2:1.30-5.el8_6.1 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat tar-2:1.34-6.el9_1 *
Tar Ubuntu bionic *
Tar Ubuntu devel *
Tar Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Tar Ubuntu focal *
Tar Ubuntu jammy *
Tar Ubuntu kinetic *
Tar Ubuntu lunar *
Tar Ubuntu trusty *
Tar Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Tar Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References