CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-48564

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Aug 22, 2023 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

read_ints in plistlib.py in Python through 3.9.1 is vulnerable to a potential DoS attack via CPU and RAM exhaustion when processing malformed Apple Property List files in binary format.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Python Python * 3.6.13 (excluding)
Python Python 3.7.0 (including) 3.7.10 (excluding)
Python Python 3.8.0 (including) 3.8.7 (excluding)
Python Python 3.9.0 (including) 3.9.1 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat python3-0:3.6.8-56.el8_9.2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat python3-0:3.6.8-56.el8_9.2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support RedHat python3-0:3.6.8-47.el8_6.4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support RedHat python3-0:3.6.8-51.el8_8.4 *
Python Ubuntu bionic *
Python Ubuntu trusty *
Python Ubuntu xenial *
Python2.7 Ubuntu bionic *
Python2.7 Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Python2.7 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Python2.7 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Python2.7 Ubuntu focal *
Python2.7 Ubuntu trusty *
Python2.7 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Python2.7 Ubuntu xenial *
Python3.4 Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Python3.4 Ubuntu trusty *
Python3.4 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Python3.5 Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Python3.5 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Python3.5 Ubuntu trusty *
Python3.5 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Python3.5 Ubuntu xenial *
Python3.6 Ubuntu bionic *
Python3.6 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Python3.7 Ubuntu bionic *
Python3.7 Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Python3.8 Ubuntu bionic *
Python3.8 Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References