CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2022-4903

Use of Implicit Intent for Sensitive Communication

Published: Feb 10, 2023 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
8.1
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A vulnerability was found in CodenameOne 7.0.70. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to use of implicit intent for sensitive communication. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. Upgrading to version 7.0.71 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as dad49c9ef26a598619fc48d2697151a02987d478. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-220470 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Weakness

The Android application uses an implicit intent for transmitting sensitive data to other applications.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Codename_one Codenameone 7.0.70 (including) 7.0.70 (including)

Extended Description

Since an implicit intent does not specify a particular application to receive the data, any application can process the intent by using an Intent Filter for that intent. This can allow untrusted applications to obtain sensitive data. There are two variations on the standard broadcast intent, ordered and sticky. Ordered broadcast intents are delivered to a series of registered receivers in order of priority as declared by the Receivers. A malicious receiver can give itself a high priority and cause a denial of service by stopping the broadcast from propagating further down the chain. There is also the possibility of malicious data modification, as a receiver may also alter the data within the Intent before passing it on to the next receiver. The downstream components have no way of asserting that the data has not been altered earlier in the chain. Sticky broadcast intents remain accessible after the initial broadcast. An old sticky intent will be broadcast again to any new receivers that register for it in the future, greatly increasing the chances of information exposure over time. Also, sticky broadcasts cannot be protected by permissions that may apply to other kinds of intents. In addition, any broadcast intent may include a URI that references data that the receiving component does not normally have the privileges to access. The sender of the intent can include special privileges that grant the receiver read or write access to the specific URI included in the intent. A malicious receiver that intercepts this intent will also gain those privileges and be able to read or write the resource at the specified URI.

Potential Mitigations

References