CVE-2022-50320

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ACPI: tables: FPDT: Dont call acpi_os_map_memory() on invalid phys address

On a Packard Bell Dot SC (Intel Atom N2600 model) there is a FPDT table which contains invalid physical addresses, with high bits set which fall outside the range of the CPU-s supported physical address range.

Calling acpi_os_map_memory() on such an invalid phys address leads to the below WARN_ON in ioremap triggering resulting in an oops/stacktrace.

Add code to verify the physical address before calling acpi_os_map_memory() to fix / avoid the oops.

[ 1.226900] ioremap: invalid physical address 3001000000000000 [ 1.226949] ————[ cut here ]———— [ 1.226962] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:200 __ioremap_caller.cold+0x43/0x5f [ 1.226996] Modules linked in: [ 1.227016] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc3+ #490 [ 1.227029] Hardware name: Packard Bell dot s/SJE01_CT, BIOS V1.10 07/23/2013 [ 1.227038] RIP: 0010:__ioremap_caller.cold+0x43/0x5f [ 1.227054] Code: 96 00 00 e9 f8 af 24 ff 89 c6 48 c7 c7 d8 0c 84 99 e8 6a 96 00 00 e9 76 af 24 ff 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 a8 0c 84 99 e8 56 96 00 00 <0f> 0b e9 60 af 24 ff 48 8b 34 24 48 c7 c7 40 0d 84 99 e8 3f 96 00 [ 1.227067] RSP: 0000:ffffb18c40033d60 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 1.227084] RAX: 0000000000000032 RBX: 3001000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 1.227095] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000000ffffdfff RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 1.227105] RBP: 3001000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb18c40033c18 [ 1.227115] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff99d62fe8 R12: 0000000000000008 [ 1.227124] R13: 0003001000000000 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 3001000000000000 [ 1.227135] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff913a3c080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 1.227146] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 1.227156] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000018c26000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 1.227167] Call Trace: [ 1.227176] [ 1.227185] ? acpi_os_map_iomem+0x1c9/0x1e0 [ 1.227215] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x187/0x370 [ 1.227254] acpi_os_map_iomem+0x1c9/0x1e0 [ 1.227288] acpi_init_fpdt+0xa8/0x253 [ 1.227308] ? acpi_debugfs_init+0x1f/0x1f [ 1.227339] do_one_initcall+0x5a/0x300 [ 1.227406] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 1.227442] kernel_init_freeable+0x28b/0x2cc [ 1.227512] ? rest_init+0x170/0x170 [ 1.227538] kernel_init+0x16/0x140 [ 1.227552] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 1.227639] [ 1.227647] irq event stamp: 186819 [ 1.227656] hardirqs last enabled at (186825): [] __up_console_sem+0x5e/0x70 [ 1.227672] hardirqs last disabled at (186830): [] __up_console_sem+0x43/0x70 [ 1.227686] softirqs last enabled at (186576): [] __irq_exit_rcu+0xed/0x160 [ 1.227701] softirqs last disabled at (186569): [] __irq_exit_rcu+0xed/0x160 [ 1.227715] —[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]—

Weakness

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Potential Mitigations

• Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

• For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.

• Be wary that a language’s interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.

• Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

• Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

• Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.

• D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.

• Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application’s memory:

• Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.

• Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.

• For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

• Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.

• For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].

References

• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16046a716c8e1f447909bec9b478d58e6e25e513
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/211391bf04b3c74e250c566eeff9cf808156c693
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/30eca146c89d216dda95868ce00a2d35cf73d5a4
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90bfc9ae875dfbed2e6089516520204cd431dba3