CVE-2023-1711

A vulnerability exists in a FOXMAN-UN and UNEM logging component, it only affects systems that use remote authentication to the network elements. If exploited an attacker could obtain confidential information.

List of CPEs:

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R9C:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R10C:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R11A:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R11B:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R14A:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R14B:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R15A:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R15B:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman_un:R16A:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R9C:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R10C:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R11A:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R11B:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R14A:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R14B:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R15A:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R15B:::::::*

• cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy: unem :R16A:::::::*

Weakness

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes output that is written to logs.

Affected Software

Extended Description

This can allow an attacker to forge log entries or inject malicious content into logs. Log forging vulnerabilities occur when:

Potential Mitigations

• Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
• When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
• Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

Related Attack Patterns

• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/268.html
• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/81.html
• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/93.html

References

• https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=8DBD000155\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=\u0026Action=Launch
• https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=8DBD000166\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=\u0026Action=Launch
• https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=8DBD000155\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=\u0026Action=Launch
• https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=8DBD000166\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=\u0026Action=Launch