CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-25690

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

Published: Mar 07, 2023 | Modified: Dec 18, 2025
CVSS 3.x
9.8
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
9.8 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

Some mod_proxy configurations on Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 through 2.4.55 allow a HTTP Request Smuggling attack.

Configurations are affected when mod_proxy is enabled along with some form of RewriteRule or ProxyPassMatch in which a non-specific pattern matches some portion of the user-supplied request-target (URL) data and is then re-inserted into the proxied request-target using variable substitution. For example, something like:

RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^/here/(.*) http://example.com:8080/elsewhere?$1; [P] ProxyPassReverse /here/ http://example.com:8080/

Request splitting/smuggling could result in bypass of access controls in the proxy server, proxying unintended URLs to existing origin servers, and cache poisoning. Users are recommended to update to at least version 2.4.56 of Apache HTTP Server.

Weakness

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Http_serverApache2.4.0 (including)2.4.55 (including)
JBCS httpd 2.4.51.sp2RedHathttpd*
JBoss Core Services for RHEL 8RedHatjbcs-httpd24-httpd-0:2.4.51-39.el8jbcs*
JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7RedHatjbcs-httpd24-httpd-0:2.4.51-39.el7jbcs*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHathttpd-0:2.4.6-98.el7_9.7*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHathttpd:2.4-8070020230328121648.bd1311ed*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRedHathttpd:2.4-8010020230329005620.c27ad7f8*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update SupportRedHathttpd:2.4-8020020230329005331.4cda2c84*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Telecommunications Update ServiceRedHathttpd:2.4-8020020230329005331.4cda2c84*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRedHathttpd:2.4-8020020230329005331.4cda2c84*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update SupportRedHathttpd:2.4-8040020230329004917.522a0ee4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update SupportRedHathttpd:2.4-8060020230328221009.ad008a3a*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHathttpd-0:2.4.53-7.el9_1.5*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatmod_http2-0:1.15.19-3.el9_1.5*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update SupportRedHathttpd-0:2.4.51-7.el9_0.4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update SupportRedHatmod_http2-0:1.15.19-3.el9_0.5*
Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7RedHathttpd24-httpd-0:2.4.34-23.el7.6*
Apache2Ubuntubionic*
Apache2Ubuntudevel*
Apache2Ubuntuesm-infra-legacy/trusty*
Apache2Ubuntuesm-infra/bionic*
Apache2Ubuntuesm-infra/focal*
Apache2Ubuntuesm-infra/xenial*
Apache2Ubuntufocal*
Apache2Ubuntujammy*
Apache2Ubuntukinetic*
Apache2Ubuntulunar*
Apache2Ubuntumantic*
Apache2Ubuntunoble*
Apache2Ubuntuoracular*
Apache2Ubuntuplucky*
Apache2Ubuntuquesting*
Apache2Ubuntutrusty*
Apache2Ubuntutrusty/esm*
Apache2Ubuntuupstream*
Apache2Ubuntuxenial*

Extended Description

HTTP requests or responses (“messages”) can be malformed or unexpected in ways that cause web servers or clients to interpret the messages in different ways than intermediary HTTP agents such as load balancers, reverse proxies, web caching proxies, application firewalls, etc. For example, an adversary may be able to add duplicate or different header fields that a client or server might interpret as one set of messages, whereas the intermediary might interpret the same sequence of bytes as a different set of messages. For example, discrepancies can arise in how to handle duplicate headers like two Transfer-encoding (TE) or two Content-length (CL), or the malicious HTTP message will have different headers for TE and CL. The inconsistent parsing and interpretation of messages can allow the adversary to “smuggle” a message to the client/server without the intermediary being aware of it. This weakness is usually the result of the usage of outdated or incompatible HTTP protocol versions in the HTTP agents.

Potential Mitigations

References