CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-29449

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Jul 13, 2023 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
4.9
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

JavaScript preprocessing, webhooks and global scripts can cause uncontrolled CPU, memory, and disk I/O utilization. Preprocessing/webhook/global script configuration and testing are only available to Administrative roles (Admin and Superadmin). Administrative privileges should be typically granted to users who need to perform tasks that require more control over the system. The security risk is limited because not all users have this level of access.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Zabbix Zabbix * 5.0.31 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.0.0 (including) 6.0.13 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.1 (including) 6.4.4 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-alpha1 (including) 6.4.0-alpha1 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-beta1 (including) 6.4.0-beta1 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-beta2 (including) 6.4.0-beta2 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-beta3 (including) 6.4.0-beta3 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-beta4 (including) 6.4.0-beta4 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-beta5 (including) 6.4.0-beta5 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-beta6 (including) 6.4.0-beta6 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-rc2 (including) 6.4.0-rc2 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-rc3 (including) 6.4.0-rc3 (including)
Zabbix Zabbix 6.4.0-rc4 (including) 6.4.0-rc4 (including)
Zabbix Ubuntu bionic *
Zabbix Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Zabbix Ubuntu jammy *
Zabbix Ubuntu kinetic *
Zabbix Ubuntu lunar *
Zabbix Ubuntu trusty *
Zabbix Ubuntu upstream *
Zabbix Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References