CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-30571

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

Published: May 29, 2023 | Modified: Jan 14, 2025
CVSS 3.x
5.3
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.3 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Ubuntu
NEGLIGIBLE

Libarchive through 3.6.2 can cause directories to have world-writable permissions. The umask() call inside archive_write_disk_posix.c changes the umask of the whole process for a very short period of time; a race condition with another thread can lead to a permanent umask 0 setting. Such a race condition could lead to implicit directory creation with permissions 0777 (without the sticky bit), which means that any low-privileged local user can delete and rename files inside those directories.

Weakness

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Libarchive Libarchive * 3.6.2 (including)
Libarchive Ubuntu bionic *
Libarchive Ubuntu devel *
Libarchive Ubuntu esm-infra-legacy/trusty *
Libarchive Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Libarchive Ubuntu esm-infra/focal *
Libarchive Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Libarchive Ubuntu focal *
Libarchive Ubuntu jammy *
Libarchive Ubuntu kinetic *
Libarchive Ubuntu lunar *
Libarchive Ubuntu trusty *
Libarchive Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Libarchive Ubuntu xenial *

Extended Description

A race condition occurs within concurrent environments, and it is effectively a property of a code sequence. Depending on the context, a code sequence may be in the form of a function call, a small number of instructions, a series of program invocations, etc. A race condition violates these properties, which are closely related:

A race condition exists when an “interfering code sequence” can still access the shared resource, violating exclusivity. The interfering code sequence could be “trusted” or “untrusted.” A trusted interfering code sequence occurs within the product; it cannot be modified by the attacker, and it can only be invoked indirectly. An untrusted interfering code sequence can be authored directly by the attacker, and typically it is external to the vulnerable product.

Potential Mitigations

  • Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring.
  • Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).

References