CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-31122

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Oct 23, 2023 | Modified: Jun 10, 2024
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
LOW

Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in mod_macro of Apache HTTP Server.This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: through 2.4.57.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Http_server Apache * 2.4.57 (including)
JBoss Core Services for RHEL 8 RedHat jbcs-httpd24-httpd-0:2.4.57-9.el8jbcs *
JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 RedHat jbcs-httpd24-httpd-0:2.4.57-9.el7jbcs *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat httpd:2.4-8100020240405103607.e155f54d *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat httpd-0:2.4.57-8.el9 *
Red Hat JBoss Core Services 1 RedHat httpd *
Apache2 Ubuntu bionic *
Apache2 Ubuntu devel *
Apache2 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Apache2 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Apache2 Ubuntu focal *
Apache2 Ubuntu jammy *
Apache2 Ubuntu lunar *
Apache2 Ubuntu mantic *
Apache2 Ubuntu trusty *
Apache2 Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Apache2 Ubuntu upstream *
Apache2 Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References