CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-32307

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Published: May 26, 2023 | Modified: Feb 27, 2024
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

Sofia-SIP is an open-source SIP User-Agent library, compliant with the IETF RFC3261 specification. Referring to GHSA-8599-x7rq-fr54, several other potential heap-over-flow and integer-overflow in stun_parse_attr_error_code and stun_parse_attr_uint32 were found because the lack of attributes length check when Sofia-SIP handles STUN packets. The previous patch of GHSA-8599-x7rq-fr54 fixed the vulnerability when attr_type did not match the enum value, but there are also vulnerabilities in the handling of other valid cases. The OOB read and integer-overflow made by attacker may lead to crash, high consumption of memory or even other more serious consequences. These issue have been addressed in version 1.13.15. Users are advised to upgrade.

Weakness

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Sofia-sip Signalwire * 1.13.15 (excluding)
Sip4 Ubuntu bionic *
Sip4 Ubuntu kinetic *
Sip4 Ubuntu trusty *
Sip4 Ubuntu xenial *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu bionic *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu devel *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu focal *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu jammy *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu kinetic *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu lunar *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu mantic *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu trusty *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu upstream *
Sofia-sip Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

References