CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-37327

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Published: May 03, 2024 | Modified: May 03, 2024
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

GStreamer FLAC File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GStreamer. Interaction with this library is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation.

The specific flaw exists within the parsing of FLAC audio files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in an integer overflow before allocating a buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-20775.

Weakness

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Gst-plugins-base0.10 Ubuntu bionic *
Gst-plugins-base0.10 Ubuntu trusty *
Gst-plugins-base0.10 Ubuntu xenial *
Gst-plugins-base1.0 Ubuntu bionic *
Gst-plugins-base1.0 Ubuntu focal *
Gst-plugins-base1.0 Ubuntu jammy *
Gst-plugins-base1.0 Ubuntu lunar *
Gst-plugins-base1.0 Ubuntu trusty *
Gst-plugins-base1.0 Ubuntu upstream *
Gst-plugins-base1.0 Ubuntu xenial *
Gst-plugins-good0.10 Ubuntu bionic *
Gst-plugins-good0.10 Ubuntu trusty *
Gst-plugins-good0.10 Ubuntu xenial *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu bionic *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu focal *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu jammy *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu lunar *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu trusty *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu upstream *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu xenial *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-4.el8 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.22.1-2.el9 *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
  • Understand the programming language’s underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, “not-a-number” calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.

References