CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-38127

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Published: Oct 19, 2023 | Modified: Oct 25, 2023
CVSS 3.x
7.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

An integer overflow exists in the HyperLinkFrame stream parser of Ichitaro 2023 1.0.1.59372. A specially crafted document can cause the parser to make an under-sized allocation, which can later allow for memory corruption, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.

Weakness

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Easy_postcard_max Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_2021 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_2022 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_2023 Justsystems 1.0.1.59372 (including) 1.0.1.59372 (including)
Ichitaro_government_10 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_government_8 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_government_9 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_pro_3 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_pro_4 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Ichitaro_pro_5 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_government_3 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_government_4 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_government_5 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_office_3 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_office_4 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_office_5 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_police_3 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_police_4 Justsystems - (including) - (including)
Just_police_5 Justsystems - (including) - (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
  • Understand the programming language’s underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, “not-a-number” calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.

References