CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-44429

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Published: May 03, 2024 | Modified: May 03, 2024
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.8 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

GStreamer AV1 Codec Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GStreamer. Interaction with this library is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation.

The specific flaw exists within the parsing of AV1 encoded video files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-22226.

Weakness

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0:1.22.1-2.el9_3 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0:1.18.4-6.el9_0 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0:1.18.4-7.el9_2 *
Gst-plugins-bad0.10 Ubuntu bionic *
Gst-plugins-bad0.10 Ubuntu trusty *
Gst-plugins-bad0.10 Ubuntu xenial *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu bionic *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu devel *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu jammy *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu lunar *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu mantic *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu noble *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu oracular *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu trusty *
Gst-plugins-bad1.0 Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

References