CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-45814

Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime

Published: Oct 18, 2023 | Modified: Oct 30, 2023
CVSS 3.x
5.3
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

Bunkum is an open-source protocol-agnostic request server for custom game servers. First, a little bit of background. So, in the beginning, Bunkums AuthenticationService only supported injecting IUsers. However, as Refresh and SoundShapesServer implemented permissions systems support for injecting ITokens into endpoints was added. All was well until 4.0. Bunkum 4.0 then changed to enforce relations between ITokens and IUsers. This wasnt implemented in a very good way in the AuthenticationService, and ended up breaking caching in such a way that cached tokens would persist after the lifetime of the request - since we tried to cache both tokens and users. From that point until now, from what I understand, Bunkum was attempting to use that cached token at the start of the next request once cached. Naturally, when that token expired, downstream projects like Refresh would remove the object from Realm - and cause the object in the cache to be in a detached state, causing an exception from invalid use of IToken.User. So in other words, a use-after-free since Realm cant manage the lifetime of the cached token. Security-wise, the scope is fairly limited, can only be pulled off on a couple endpoints given a few conditions, and you cant guarantee which token youre going to get. Also, the token would get invalidated properly if the endpoint had either a IToken usage or a IUser usage. The fix is to just wipe the token cache after the request was handled, which is now in 4.2.1. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Weakness

The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Bunkum Littlebigfresh 4.0 (including) 4.2.1 (excluding)

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, languages such as Java, Ruby, and Lisp perform automatic garbage collection that releases memory for objects that have been deallocated.
  • Use resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems.
  • When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users.
  • Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).

References