CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-45857

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Published: Nov 08, 2023 | Modified: Nov 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

An issue discovered in Axios 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.

Weakness

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Axios Axios 1.5.1 (including) 1.5.1 (including)
Migration Toolkit for Runtimes 1 on RHEL 8 RedHat axios *
MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-windup-addon-rhel9:6.2.3-2 *
MTA-7.0-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-cli-rhel9:7.0.3-16 *
MTA-7.0-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-ui-rhel9:7.0.3-13 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-central-db-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-collector-rhel8:4.7.0-3 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-operator-bundle:4.7.0-3 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-rhel8-operator:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-roxctl-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-db-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-db-slim-rhel8:4.7.0-3 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-slim-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-v4-db-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.7 RedHat advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-v4-rhel8:4.7.0-4 *
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8 RedHat automation-controller-0:4.5.5-2.el8ap *
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 9 RedHat automation-controller-0:4.5.5-2.el9ap *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.8 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-ui-rhel8:v1.8.3-4 *
RHEL-8-CNV-4.12 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin:v4.12.12-7 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.13 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.13.10-387 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.14 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.14.6-195 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.15 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.15.2-383 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.16 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.16.0-4001 *
Node-axios Ubuntu bionic *
Node-axios Ubuntu focal *
Node-axios Ubuntu lunar *
Node-axios Ubuntu mantic *
Node-axios Ubuntu oracular *
Node-axios Ubuntu trusty *
Node-axios Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Use the “double-submitted cookie” method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user’s machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]

References