CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2023-45857

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Published: Nov 08, 2023 | Modified: Jun 21, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.5
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

An issue discovered in Axios 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.

Weakness

The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Axios Axios 1.5.1 (including) 1.5.1 (including)
Migration Toolkit for Runtimes 1 on RHEL 8 RedHat axios *
MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-windup-addon-rhel9:6.2.3-2 *
MTA-7.0-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-cli-rhel9:7.0.3-16 *
MTA-7.0-RHEL-9 RedHat mta/mta-ui-rhel9:7.0.3-13 *
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8 RedHat automation-controller-0:4.5.5-2.el8ap *
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 9 RedHat automation-controller-0:4.5.5-2.el9ap *
Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.8 RedHat rhmtc/openshift-migration-ui-rhel8:v1.8.3-4 *
RHEL-8-CNV-4.12 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin:v4.12.12-7 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.13 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.13.10-387 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.14 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.14.6-195 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.15 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.15.2-383 *
RHEL-9-CNV-4.16 RedHat container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:v4.16.0-4001 *
Node-axios Ubuntu bionic *
Node-axios Ubuntu lunar *
Node-axios Ubuntu mantic *
Node-axios Ubuntu trusty *
Node-axios Ubuntu xenial *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Use the “double-submitted cookie” method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user’s machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]

References