A flaw was found in XNIO. The XNIO NotifierState that can cause a Stack Overflow Exception when the chain of notifier states becomes problematically large can lead to uncontrolled resource management and a possible denial of service (DoS).
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
| Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAP 7.4.14 | RedHat | * | |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.4.0 for Spring Boot | RedHat | xnio | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-apache-cxf-0:3.1.16-3.SP1_redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-avro-0:1.7.6-2.redhat_00003.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-bouncycastle-0:1.68.0-1.redhat_00005.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-h2database-0:1.4.197-2.redhat_00005.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jackson-databind-0:2.8.11.6-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-marshalling-0:2.0.15-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-xnio-base-0:3.5.10-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-wildfly-0:7.1.8-2.GA_redhat_00002.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-xalan-j2-0:2.7.1-26.redhat_00015.1.ep7.el7 | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-apache-cxf-0:3.4.10-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-avro-0:1.7.6-8.redhat_00003.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-h2database-0:1.4.197-3.redhat_00004.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-annotations-api_1.3_spec-0:2.0.1-4.Final_redhat_00001.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-marshalling-0:2.0.15-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-server-migration-0:1.7.2-12.Final_redhat_00013.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-xnio-base-0:3.7.13-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-log4j-jboss-logmanager-0:1.2.2-2.Final_redhat_00002.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-wildfly-0:7.3.11-4.GA_redhat_00002.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-wss4j-0:2.3.3-2.redhat_00001.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-xalan-j2-0:2.7.1-38.redhat_00015.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-xml-security-0:2.2.3-2.redhat_00001.1.el7eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 for RHEL 8 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-xnio-base-0:3.8.11-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.el8eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 for RHEL 9 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-xnio-base-0:3.8.11-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.el9eap | * |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 on RHEL 7 | RedHat | eap7-jboss-xnio-base-0:3.8.11-1.SP1_redhat_00001.1.el7eap | * |
| Jboss-xnio | Ubuntu | focal | * |
| Jboss-xnio | Ubuntu | mantic | * |
| Jboss-xnio | Ubuntu | oracular | * |
Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.