CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-0131

Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value

Published: Feb 02, 2025 | Modified: Feb 02, 2025
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

NVIDIA GPU kernel driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where a potential user-mode attacker could read  a buffer with an incorrect length. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service.

Weakness

The product uses a sequential operation to read or write a buffer, but it uses an incorrect length value that causes it to access memory that is outside of the bounds of the buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-352 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-352-updates Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-361 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-367 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-384 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 Ubuntu noble *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server Ubuntu noble *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-520 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-520 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-520 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-520 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server Ubuntu upstream *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 Ubuntu focal *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 Ubuntu jammy *
Nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 Ubuntu upstream *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.

  • Be wary that a language’s interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

  • Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.

  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.

  • Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application’s memory:

  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.

  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

  • Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.

  • For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].

  • Run the code in a “jail” or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.

  • OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.

  • This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.

  • Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.

References