A heap overflow flaw was found in 389-ds-base. This issue leads to a denial of service when writing a value larger than 256 chars in log_entry_attr.
Weakness
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Affected Software
| Name |
Vendor |
Start Version |
End Version |
| 389_directory_server |
Redhat |
* |
2.2.0 (excluding) |
| Red Hat Directory Server 11.7 for RHEL 8 |
RedHat |
redhat-ds:11-8080020240306153507.f969626e |
* |
| Red Hat Directory Server 11.8 for RHEL 8 |
RedHat |
redhat-ds:11-8090020240606122459.91529cd0 |
* |
| Red Hat Directory Server 12.2 EUS for RHEL 9 |
RedHat |
redhat-ds:12-9020020240916150035.1674d574 |
* |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
RedHat |
389-ds:1.4-8100020240315011748.945b6f6d |
* |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support |
RedHat |
389-ds:1.4-8060020240213164457.824efc52 |
* |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support |
RedHat |
389-ds:1.4-8080020240807050952.6dbb3803 |
* |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support |
RedHat |
389-ds-base-0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 |
* |
| 389-ds-base |
Ubuntu |
bionic |
* |
| 389-ds-base |
Ubuntu |
mantic |
* |
| 389-ds-base |
Ubuntu |
trusty |
* |
| 389-ds-base |
Ubuntu |
xenial |
* |
Potential Mitigations
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
References