CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-11233

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Published: Nov 24, 2024 | Modified: Nov 03, 2025
CVSS 3.x
8.2
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
4.8 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, due to an error inĀ convert.quoted-printable-decode filter certain data can lead to buffer overread by one byte, which can in certain circumstances lead to crashes or disclose content of other memory areas.

Weakness

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
PhpPhp8.1.0 (including)8.1.31 (excluding)
PhpPhp8.2.0 (including)8.2.26 (excluding)
PhpPhp8.3.0 (including)8.3.14 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatphp:8.2-8100020250903052702.f7998665*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatphp:7.4-8100020260119075152.f7998665*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatphp:8.1-9050020250423093228.9*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatphp-0:8.0.30-2.el9*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatphp:8.2-9060020250428130539.9*
Php5Ubuntutrusty/esm*
Php7.0Ubuntuesm-infra/xenial*
Php7.4Ubuntuesm-infra/focal*
Php7.4Ubuntufocal*
Php8.1Ubuntujammy*
Php8.3Ubuntunoble*
Php8.3Ubuntuoracular*

Potential Mitigations

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

References