CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-23138

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Published: Mar 18, 2024 | Modified: Jul 29, 2025
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A maliciously crafted DWG file when parsed through Autodesk DWG TrueView can be used to cause a Stack-based Overflow. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

Weakness

A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Advance_steel Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Advance_steel Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Advance_steel Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Advance_steel Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.4.1 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.3.1 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.2 (excluding)
Autocad Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (including)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.4.1 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.3.1 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.2 (excluding)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.15 (excluding)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2021 (including) 2021.1.4 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)
Dwg_trueview Autodesk 2022 (including) 2022.1.4 (excluding)
Dwg_trueview Autodesk 2023 (including) 2023.1.5 (excluding)
Dwg_trueview Autodesk 2024 (including) 2024.1.3 (excluding)

Potential Mitigations

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

References