CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-27833

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Published: Jun 10, 2024 | Modified: Jul 03, 2024
CVSS 3.x
8.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.8 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

An integer overflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in tvOS 17.5, iOS 16.7.8 and iPadOS 16.7.8, visionOS 1.2, Safari 17.5, iOS 17.5 and iPadOS 17.5. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution.

Weakness

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Safari Apple * 17.5 (excluding)
Ipados Apple * 16.7.8 (excluding)
Ipados Apple 17.0 (including) 17.5 (excluding)
Iphone_os Apple * 16.7.8 (excluding)
Iphone_os Apple 17.0 (including) 17.5 (excluding)
Tvos Apple * 17.5 (excluding)
Visionos Apple * 1.2 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.38.5-1.el8_8.5 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el8_8 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.38.5-1.el9_2.3 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.1-1.el9_0 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support RedHat webkit2gtk3-0:2.46.3-1.el9_2 *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu devel *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-apps/noble *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu focal *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu jammy *
Qtwebkit-opensource-src Ubuntu noble *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Qtwebkit-source Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu focal *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu jammy *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu noble *
Webkit2gtk Ubuntu upstream *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu esm-apps/bionic *
Webkitgtk Ubuntu esm-apps/xenial *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu esm-apps/focal *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu esm-apps/jammy *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu focal *
Wpewebkit Ubuntu jammy *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
  • Understand the programming language’s underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, “not-a-number” calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.

References