.NET and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Weakness
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Affected Software
| Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
|---|
| .net | Microsoft | 7.0.0 (including) | 7.0.19 (excluding) |
| .net | Microsoft | 8.0.0 (including) | 8.0.5 (excluding) |
| Powershell | Microsoft | 7.4 (including) | 7.4.3 (excluding) |
| Visual_studio_2022 | Microsoft | 17.4.0 (including) | 17.4.19 (excluding) |
| Visual_studio_2022 | Microsoft | 17.6.0 (including) | 17.6.15 (excluding) |
| Visual_studio_2022 | Microsoft | 17.8.0 (including) | 17.8.10 (excluding) |
| Visual_studio_2022 | Microsoft | 17.9.0 (including) | 17.9.7 (excluding) |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | RedHat | dotnet7.0-0:7.0.119-1.el8_10 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | RedHat | dotnet8.0-0:8.0.105-1.el8_10 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | RedHat | dotnet8.0-0:8.0.105-1.el9_4 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | RedHat | dotnet7.0-0:7.0.119-1.el9_4 | * |
| Dotnet7 | Ubuntu | jammy | * |
| Dotnet7 | Ubuntu | mantic | * |
| Dotnet7 | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
| Dotnet8 | Ubuntu | devel | * |
| Dotnet8 | Ubuntu | jammy | * |
| Dotnet8 | Ubuntu | mantic | * |
| Dotnet8 | Ubuntu | noble | * |
| Dotnet8 | Ubuntu | upstream | * |
Potential Mitigations
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
References