A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the SDHCI device emulation of QEMU. The bug is triggered when both s->data_count and the size of  s->fifo_buffer are set to 0x200, leading to an out-of-bound access. A malicious guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU process on the host, resulting in a denial of service condition.
Weakness
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Affected Software
| Name | 
Vendor | 
Start Version | 
End Version | 
| Qemu | 
Qemu | 
* | 
7.2.11 (excluding) | 
| Qemu | 
Qemu | 
8.0.0 (including) | 
8.2.3 (excluding) | 
| Qemu | 
Qemu | 
9.0.0 (including) | 
9.0.0 (including) | 
| Qemu | 
Qemu | 
9.0.0-rc0 (including) | 
9.0.0-rc0 (including) | 
| Qemu | 
Qemu | 
9.0.0-rc1 (including) | 
9.0.0-rc1 (including) | 
| Qemu | 
Qemu | 
9.0.0-rc2 (including) | 
9.0.0-rc2 (including) | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
devel | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
focal | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
jammy | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
mantic | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
noble | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
oracular | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
plucky | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
questing | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
trusty/esm | 
* | 
| Qemu | 
Ubuntu | 
upstream | 
* | 
Potential Mitigations
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
 
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
 
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
 
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
 
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
 
References