CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-41946

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Aug 01, 2024 | Modified: Jan 17, 2025
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
3.3 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

REXML is an XML toolkit for Ruby. The REXML gem 3.3.2 has a DoS vulnerability when it parses an XML that has many entity expansions with SAX2 or pull parser API. The REXML gem 3.3.3 or later include the patch to fix the vulnerability.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Rexml Ruby-lang * 3.3.3 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat ruby:3.3-8100020240906074654.489197e6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat ruby:3.1-8100020250407112943.489197e6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat pcs-0:0.10.18-2.el8_10.2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat pcs-0:0.10.12-6.el8_6.6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat pcs-0:0.10.12-6.el8_6.6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support RedHat pcs-0:0.10.15-4.el8_8.3 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat ruby:3.3-9040020240906110954.9 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat ruby:3.1-9050020250404144903.9 *
Jruby Ubuntu focal *
Jruby Ubuntu oracular *
Jruby Ubuntu trusty/esm *
Ruby2.3 Ubuntu esm-infra/xenial *
Ruby2.5 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Ruby2.7 Ubuntu esm-infra/focal *
Ruby2.7 Ubuntu focal *
Ruby3.0 Ubuntu jammy *
Ruby3.2 Ubuntu noble *
Ruby3.3 Ubuntu devel *
Ruby3.3 Ubuntu oracular *
Ruby3.3 Ubuntu plucky *

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References