CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-43110

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Sep 05, 2024 | Modified: Sep 05, 2024
CVSS 3.x
8.8
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

The ctl_request_sense function could expose up to three bytes of the kernel heap to userspace.

Malicious software running in a guest VM that exposes virtio_scsi can exploit the vulnerabilities to achieve code execution on the host in the bhyve userspace process, which typically runs as root. Note that bhyve runs in a Capsicum sandbox, so malicious code is constrained by the capabilities available to the bhyve process. A malicious iSCSI initiator could achieve remote code execution on the iSCSI target host.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Freebsd Freebsd 13.0 (including) 13.3 (excluding)
Freebsd Freebsd 13.3 (including) 13.3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 13.3-p1 (including) 13.3-p1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 13.3-p2 (including) 13.3-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 13.3-p3 (including) 13.3-p3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 13.3-p4 (including) 13.3-p4 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 13.3-p5 (including) 13.3-p5 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 13.4-beta3 (including) 13.4-beta3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0 (including) 14.0 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-beta5 (including) 14.0-beta5 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p1 (including) 14.0-p1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p2 (including) 14.0-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p3 (including) 14.0-p3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p4 (including) 14.0-p4 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p5 (including) 14.0-p5 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p6 (including) 14.0-p6 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p7 (including) 14.0-p7 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p8 (including) 14.0-p8 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-p9 (including) 14.0-p9 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-rc3 (including) 14.0-rc3 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.0-rc4-p1 (including) 14.0-rc4-p1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.1 (including) 14.1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.1-p1 (including) 14.1-p1 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.1-p2 (including) 14.1-p2 (including)
Freebsd Freebsd 14.1-p3 (including) 14.1-p3 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References