CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-47537

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Published: Dec 12, 2024 | Modified: Dec 19, 2024
CVSS 3.x
9.8
CRITICAL
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.4 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

GStreamer is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The program attempts to reallocate the memory pointed to by stream->samples to accommodate stream->n_samples + samples_count elements of type QtDemuxSample. The problem is that samples_count is read from the input file. And if this value is big enough, this can lead to an integer overflow during the addition. As a consequence, g_try_renew might allocate memory for a significantly smaller number of elements than intended. Following this, the program iterates through samples_count elements and attempts to write samples_count number of elements, potentially exceeding the actual allocated memory size and causing an OOB-write. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.24.10.

Weakness

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Gstreamer Gstreamer_project * 1.24.10 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-base-0:1.10.4-3.el7_9 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.10.4-3.el7_9 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-5.el8_10 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-2.el8_2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-3.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.16.1-4.el8_8 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.22.1-3.el9_5 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.18.4-6.el9_0 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.18.4-7.el9_2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support RedHat gstreamer1-plugins-good-0:1.22.1-3.el9_4 *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu focal *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu jammy *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu noble *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu oracular *
Gst-plugins-good1.0 Ubuntu upstream *

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences.
  • Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
  • Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range.
  • Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum values.
  • Understand the programming language’s underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, “not-a-number” calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]
  • Also be careful to account for 32-bit, 64-bit, and other potential differences that may affect the numeric representation.

References