AshPostgres is the PostgreSQL data layer for Ash Framework. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.4.10, in certain very specific situations, it was possible for the policies of an update action to be skipped. This occurred only on empty update actions (no changing fields), and would allow their hooks (side effects) to be performed when they should not have been. Note that this does not allow reading new data that the user should not have had access to, only triggering a side effect a user should not have been able to trigger.
To be vulnerable, an affected user must have an update action that is on a resource with no attributes containing an update default (updated_at timestamp, for example); can be performed atomically; does not have require_atomic? false; has at least one authorizer (typically Ash.Policy.Authorizer); and has at least one change (on the resources changes block or in the action itself). This is where the side-effects would be performed when they should not have been.
This problem has been patched in 2.4.10 of ash_postgres. Several workarounds are available. Potentially affected users may determine that none of their actions are vulnerable using a script the maintainers provide in the GitHub Security Advisory, add require_atomic? false to any potentially affected update action, replace any usage of Ash.update with Ash.bulk_update for an affected action, and/or add an update timestamp to their action.
The product makes files or directories accessible to unauthorized actors, even though they should not be.
Web servers, FTP servers, and similar servers may store a set of files underneath a “root” directory that is accessible to the server’s users. Applications may store sensitive files underneath this root without also using access control to limit which users may request those files, if any. Alternately, an application might package multiple files or directories into an archive file (e.g., ZIP or tar), but the application might not exclude sensitive files that are underneath those directories. In cloud technologies and containers, this weakness might present itself in the form of misconfigured storage accounts that can be read or written by a public or anonymous user.