CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-8386

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

Published: Sep 03, 2024 | Modified: Sep 06, 2024
CVSS 3.x
6.1
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.1 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Ubuntu
MEDIUM

If a site had been granted the permission to open popup windows, it could cause Select elements to appear on top of another site to perform a spoofing attack. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 130, Firefox ESR < 128.2, and Thunderbird < 128.2.

Weakness

A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Firefox Mozilla * 130.0 (excluding)
Firefox_esr Mozilla * 128.2 (excluding)
Firefox Ubuntu focal *
Mozjs102 Ubuntu esm-apps/noble *
Mozjs102 Ubuntu jammy *
Mozjs102 Ubuntu noble *
Mozjs115 Ubuntu devel *
Mozjs115 Ubuntu noble *
Mozjs115 Ubuntu oracular *
Mozjs52 Ubuntu esm-infra/bionic *
Mozjs52 Ubuntu focal *
Mozjs68 Ubuntu focal *
Mozjs78 Ubuntu jammy *
Mozjs91 Ubuntu jammy *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el7_9 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el8_10 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el8_10 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el8_2 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el8_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el8_6 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el8_8 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat firefox-0:128.2.0-1.el9_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el9_4 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el9_0 *
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support RedHat thunderbird-0:128.2.0-1.el9_2 *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Use a list of approved URLs or domains to be used for redirection.
  • When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • For example, ID 1 could map to “/login.asp” and ID 2 could map to “http://www.example.com/". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
  • Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Many open redirect problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, such as cookies and hidden form fields.

References