CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-12270

Improper Control of Resource Identifiers ('Resource Injection')

Published: Oct 27, 2025 | Modified: Oct 31, 2025
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A vulnerability was determined in LearnHouse up to 98dfad76aad70711a8113f6c1fdabfccf10509ca. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /api/v1/assignments/{assignment_id}/tasks/{task_id}/sub_file of the component Student Assignment Submission Handler. This manipulation causes improper control of resource identifiers. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Weakness

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not restrict or incorrectly restricts the input before it is used as an identifier for a resource that may be outside the intended sphere of control.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Learnhouse Learnhouse * 2025-09-21 (including)

Extended Description

A resource injection issue occurs when the following two conditions are met:

This may enable an attacker to access or modify otherwise protected system resources.

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, it can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References