CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-20058

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Feb 05, 2025 | Modified: Oct 21, 2025
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

When a BIG-IP message routing profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Big-ip_access_policy_managerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_advanced_firewall_managerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewallF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_analyticsF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_application_acceleration_managerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_application_security_managerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_application_visibility_and_reportingF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_automation_toolchainF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_carrier-grade_natF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_container_ingress_servicesF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_ddos_hybrid_defenderF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_domain_name_systemF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_edge_gatewayF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_fraud_protection_serviceF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_global_traffic_managerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_link_controllerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_local_traffic_managerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_policy_enforcement_managerF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_ssl_orchestratorF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_webacceleratorF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)
Big-ip_websafeF515.1.0 (including)15.1.10 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References