CVE-2025-21719

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipmr: do not call mr_mfc_uses_dev() for unres entries

syzbot found that calling mr_mfc_uses_dev() for unres entries would crash [1], because c->mfc_un.res.minvif / c->mfc_un.res.maxvif alias to struct sk_buff_head unresolved, which contain two pointers.

This code never worked, lets remove it.

[1] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff5fff2d536613 KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xfffefff96a9b3098-0xfffefff96a9b309f] Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 7321 Comm: syz.0.16 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-syzkaller-g1950a0af2d55 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=–) pc : mr_mfc_uses_dev net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:290 [inline] pc : mr_table_dump+0x5a4/0x8b0 net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:334 lr : mr_mfc_uses_dev net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:289 [inline] lr : mr_table_dump+0x694/0x8b0 net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:334 Call trace: mr_mfc_uses_dev net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:290 [inline] (P) mr_table_dump+0x5a4/0x8b0 net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:334 (P) mr_rtm_dumproute+0x254/0x454 net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:382 ipmr_rtm_dumproute+0x248/0x4b4 net/ipv4/ipmr.c:2648 rtnl_dump_all+0x2e4/0x4e8 net/core/rtnetlink.c:4327 rtnl_dumpit+0x98/0x1d0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6791 netlink_dump+0x4f0/0xbc0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2317 netlink_recvmsg+0x56c/0xe64 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1973 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1033 [inline] sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:1055 [inline] sock_read_iter+0x2d8/0x40c net/socket.c:1125 new_sync_read fs/read_write.c:484 [inline] vfs_read+0x740/0x970 fs/read_write.c:565 ksys_read+0x15c/0x26c fs/read_write.c:708

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Potential Mitigations

• Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
• When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
• Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
• To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

Related Attack Patterns

• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/540.html

References

• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15a901361ec3fb1c393f91880e1cbf24ec0a88bd
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26bb7d991f04eeef47dfad23e533834995c26f7a
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53df27fd38f84bd3cd6b004eb4ff3c4903114f1d
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/547ef7e8cbb98f966c8719a3e15d4e078aaa9b47
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57177c5f47a8da852f8d76cf6945cf803f8bb9e5
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/71a0fcb68c0a5f3ec912b540cd5d72148e6ee5f1
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a099834a51ccf9bbba3de86a251b3433539abfde
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b379b3162ff55a70464c6a934ae9bf0497478a62
• https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00028.html
• https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00030.html