CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-32990

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Published: Jul 10, 2025 | Modified: Dec 01, 2025
CVSS 3.x
8.2
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.5 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

A heap-buffer-overflow (off-by-one) flaw was found in the GnuTLS software in the template parsing logic within the certtool utility. When it reads certain settings from a template file, it allows an attacker to cause an out-of-bounds (OOB) NULL pointer write, resulting in memory corruption and a denial-of-service (DoS) that could potentially crash the system.

Weakness

A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
GnutlsGnu- (including)- (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10RedHatgnutls-0:3.8.9-9.el10_0.14*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatgnutls-0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatgnutls-0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatgnutls-0:3.8.3-6.el9_6.2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatgnutls-0:3.8.3-6.el9_6.2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRedHatgnutls-0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRedHatgnutls-0:3.8.3-4.el9_4.4*
Red Hat Ceph Storage 7RedHatrhceph/rhceph-7-rhel9:sha256:ce213d48fbefae6b9d5f5a64b79c6ed016afcb646bf7b5742707ed31f9a464a2*
Red Hat Discovery 2RedHatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:sha256:435ba9959b793d46a63a74c343bb8c3ff68350496afec12cc5e894dfc40b7648*
Red Hat Insights proxy 1.5RedHatinsights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:sha256:8eb6b896e1eac4080a564e146f95c4166e47ca137083b37119027c6a77011207*
Gnutls28Ubuntudevel*
Gnutls28Ubuntuesm-infra/bionic*
Gnutls28Ubuntuesm-infra/focal*
Gnutls28Ubuntuesm-infra/xenial*
Gnutls28Ubuntufips-updates/jammy*
Gnutls28Ubuntufips-updates/noble*
Gnutls28Ubuntujammy*
Gnutls28Ubuntunoble*
Gnutls28Ubuntuoracular*
Gnutls28Ubuntuplucky*
Gnutls28Ubuntuquesting*
Gnutls28Ubuntuupstream*

Potential Mitigations

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program’s executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as “rebasing” (for Windows) and “prelinking” (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].

References