CVE-2025-39700

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/damon/ops-common: ignore migration request to invalid nodes

damon_migrate_pages() tries migration even if the target node is invalid. If users mistakenly make such invalid requests via DAMOS_MIGRATE_{HOT,COLD} action, the below kernel BUG can happen.

[ 7831.883495] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001f48
[ 7831.884160] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 7831.884681] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 7831.885203] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 7831.885468] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ 7831.885852] CPU: 31 UID: 0 PID: 94202 Comm: kdamond.0 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-mm-new-damon+ #93 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[ 7831.886913] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-4.el9 04/01/2014
[ 7831.887777] RIP: 0010:__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof (include/linux/mmzone.h:1724 include/linux/mmzone.h:1750 mm/page_alloc.c:4936 mm/page_alloc.c:5137)
[...]
[ 7831.895953] Call Trace:
[ 7831.896195]  <TASK>
[ 7831.896397] __folio_alloc_noprof (mm/page_alloc.c:5183 mm/page_alloc.c:5192)
[ 7831.896787] migrate_pages_batch (mm/migrate.c:1189 mm/migrate.c:1851)
[ 7831.897228] ? __pfx_alloc_migration_target (mm/migrate.c:2137)
[ 7831.897735] migrate_pages (mm/migrate.c:2078)
[ 7831.898141] ? __pfx_alloc_migration_target (mm/migrate.c:2137)
[ 7831.898664] damon_migrate_folio_list (mm/damon/ops-common.c:321 mm/damon/ops-common.c:354)
[ 7831.899140] damon_migrate_pages (mm/damon/ops-common.c:405)
[...]

Add a target node validity check in damon_migrate_pages(). The validity check is stolen from that of do_pages_move(), which is being used for the move_pages() system call.

Weakness

The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.

Affected Software

Extended Description

Specified quantities include size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, and others. Code may rely on specified quantities to allocate resources, perform calculations, control iteration, etc.

Potential Mitigations

• Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
• When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
• Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References

• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c303fa1f311aadc17fa82b7bbf776412adf45de
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e6c3130690a01076efdf45aa02ba5d5c16849a0
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9d0c2d15aff96746f99a7c97221bb8ce5b62db19