CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-48432

Improper Output Neutralization for Logs

Published: Jun 05, 2025 | Modified: Jun 10, 2025
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.4 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Ubuntu
LOW

An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems.

Weakness

The product constructs a log message from external input, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements when the message is written to a log file.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 RedHat python3.11-django-0:4.2.23-1.el8ap *
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 RedHat automation-controller-0:4.6.20-1.el8ap *
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9 RedHat python3.11-django-0:4.2.23-1.el9ap *
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9 RedHat automation-controller-0:4.6.20-1.el9ap *
Python-django Ubuntu devel *
Python-django Ubuntu esm-infra/focal *
Python-django Ubuntu jammy *
Python-django Ubuntu noble *
Python-django Ubuntu oracular *
Python-django Ubuntu plucky *
Python-django Ubuntu questing *
Python-django Ubuntu upstream *

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References