CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-5046

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Aug 15, 2025 | Modified: Aug 20, 2025
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

A maliciously crafted DGN file, when linked or imported into Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Name Vendor Start Version End Version
Advance_steel Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad_architecture Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad_electrical Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad_lt Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad_map_3d Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad_mechanical Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad_mep Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Autocad_plant_3d Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)
Civil_3d Autodesk 2026 (including) 2026 (including)

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References