CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-64726

External Control of System or Configuration Setting

Published: Nov 13, 2025 | Modified: Nov 13, 2025
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu

Socket Firewall is an HTTP/HTTPS proxy server that intercepts package manager requests and enforces security policies by blocking dangerous packages. Socket Firewall binary versions (separate from installers) prior to 0.15.5 are vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when run in untrusted project directories. The vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code by placing a malicious .sfw.config file in a project directory. When a developer runs Socket Firewall commands (e.g., sfw npm install) in that directory, the tool loads the .sfw.config file and populates environment variables directly into the Node.js process. An attacker can exploit this by setting NODE_OPTIONS with a --require directive to execute malicious JavaScript code before Socket Firewalls security controls are initialized, effectively bypassing the tools malicious package detection. The attack vector is indirect and requires a developer to install dependencies for an untrusted project and execute a command within the context of the untrusted project. The vulnerability has been patched in Socket Firewall version 0.15.5. Users should upgrade to version 0.15.5 or later. The fix isolates configuration file values from subprocess environments. Look at sfw --version for version information. If users rely on the recommended installation mechanism (e.g. global installation via npm install -g sfw) then no workaround is necessary. This wrapper package automatically ensures that users are running the latest version of Socket Firewall. Users who have manually installed the binary and cannot immediately upgrade should avoid running Socket Firewall in untrusted project directories. Before running Socket Firewall in any new project, inspect .sfw.config and .env.local files for suspicious NODE_OPTIONS or other environment variable definitions that reference local files.

Weakness

One or more system settings or configuration elements can be externally controlled by a user.

Potential Mitigations

  • Compartmentalize the system to have “safe” areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References