CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-20245

Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

Published: Jun 04, 2026 | Modified: Jun 10, 2026
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
Ubuntu
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, formerly SD-WAN vSmart, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Validator, formerly SD-WAN vBond, could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root by supplying a crafted file to the affected system.

This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted file to the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform command injection attacks on an affected system and elevate their privileges as the root user.  To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have netadmin privileges on the affected system. This would require valid credentials or exploitation of or . Cisco is not aware of successful exploitation by other methods. Cisco has observed limited cases where the exploitation of this bug resulted in a configuration change pushed to edge devices. Cisco recommends that customers upgrade to the fixed software that is documented in the that was published on May 14, 2026, and verify the configuration of the edge devices.

Weakness

The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco*20.9.9.1 (excluding)
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco20.10 (including)20.12.5.4 (excluding)
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco20.12.6 (including)20.12.6.2 (excluding)
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco20.13 (including)20.15.4.4 (excluding)
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco20.15.5 (including)20.15.5.2 (excluding)
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco20.16 (including)20.18.2.2 (excluding)
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco26.1 (including)26.1.1.1 (excluding)
Catalyst_sd-wan_managerCisco20.12.7 (including)20.12.7 (including)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco*20.9.9.1 (excluding)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco20.10 (including)20.12.5.4 (excluding)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco20.12.6 (including)20.12.6.2 (excluding)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco20.13 (including)20.15.4.4 (excluding)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco20.15.5 (including)20.15.5.2 (excluding)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco20.16 (including)20.18.2.2 (excluding)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco26.1 (including)26.1.1.1 (excluding)
Sd-wan_vsmart_controllerCisco20.12.7 (including)20.12.7 (including)

Extended Description

Improper encoding or escaping can allow attackers to change the commands that are sent to another component, inserting malicious commands instead. Most products follow a certain protocol that uses structured messages for communication between components, such as queries or commands. These structured messages can contain raw data interspersed with metadata or control information. For example, “GET /index.html HTTP/1.1” is a structured message containing a command (“GET”) with a single argument ("/index.html") and metadata about which protocol version is being used (“HTTP/1.1”). If an application uses attacker-supplied inputs to construct a structured message without properly encoding or escaping, then the attacker could insert special characters that will cause the data to be interpreted as control information or metadata. Consequently, the component that receives the output will perform the wrong operations, or otherwise interpret the data incorrectly.

Potential Mitigations

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
  • Alternately, use built-in functions, but consider using wrappers in case those functions are discovered to have a vulnerability.
  • If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
  • For example, stored procedures can enforce database query structure and reduce the likelihood of SQL injection.

References