CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-34043

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Mar 31, 2026 | Modified: Jun 17, 2026
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.9 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

Serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions. Prior to version 7.0.5, there is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability caused by CPU exhaustion. When serializing a specially crafted array-like object (an object that inherits from Array.prototype but has a very large length property), the process enters an intensive loop that consumes 100% CPU and hangs indefinitely. This issue has been patched in version 7.0.5.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
SerializeYahoo*7.0.5 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10RedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el10_2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el10_0*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el8_10*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el9_8*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el9_4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportRedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el9_6*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1782211435*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1782185607*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1778256287*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1779256322*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1778644858*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1778532500*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/cephcsi-rhel9:1786705347*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/cephcsi-rhel9-operator:1786706101*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/mcg-core-rhel9:1786705558*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/mcg-rhel9-operator:1786705646*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/ocs-client-console-rhel9:1786706138*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/ocs-client-rhel9-operator:1786705741*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/ocs-metrics-exporter-rhel9:1786705777*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/ocs-rhel9-operator:1786705802*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-cli-rhel9:1786705938*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-console-rhel9:1786706577*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-cosi-sidecar-rhel9:1786706125*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-csi-addons-rhel9-operator:1786706177*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-csi-addons-sidecar-rhel9:1786706188*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-multicluster-console-rhel9:1786706679*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-multicluster-rhel9-operator:1786706357*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-must-gather-rhel9:1786706612*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odf-rhel9-operator:1786706644*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/odr-rhel9-operator:1786706659*
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18RedHatodf4/rook-ceph-rhel9-operator:1786706880*
Node-serialize-javascriptUbuntuquesting*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References