CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-34043

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Mar 31, 2026 | Modified: Apr 03, 2026
CVSS 3.x
7.5
HIGH
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
5.9 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

Serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions. Prior to version 7.0.5, there is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability caused by CPU exhaustion. When serializing a specially crafted array-like object (an object that inherits from Array.prototype but has a very large length property), the process enters an intensive loop that consumes 100% CPU and hangs indefinitely. This issue has been patched in version 7.0.5.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
SerializeYahoo*7.0.5 (excluding)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10RedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el10_2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el10_0*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el8_10*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el9_8*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Update Services for SAP SolutionsRedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el9_4*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update SupportRedHatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.127-1.el9_6*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1778256287*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1779256322*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1778644858*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21RedHatopenshift4/ose-networking-console-plugin-rhel9:1778532500*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References