CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-3505

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Apr 15, 2026 | Modified: Aug 12, 2026
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.5 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA bcpg on all (pg modules).

This vulnerability is associated with program files AEADEncDataPacket.Java, BcAEADUtil.Java, JceAEADUtil.Java, OperatorHelper.Java.

This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.74 before 1.80.2, from 1.81 before 1.81.1, from 1.82 before 1.84.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.14 for Quarkus 3.27RedHatbcpg-jdk18on*
Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14RedHatbcpg-jdk18on*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25RedHatbcpg-jdk15on*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25RedHatbcpg-jdk18on*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-glassfish-jsf-0:2.3.14-11.SP11_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-ironjacamar-0:1.5.26-2.Final_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jackson-annotations-0:2.18.8-1.redhat_00003.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jackson-core-0:2.18.8-1.redhat_00003.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jackson-databind-0:2.18.8-1.redhat_00003.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jackson-jaxrs-providers-0:2.18.8-1.redhat_00003.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jackson-modules-base-0:2.18.8-1.redhat_00003.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jackson-modules-java8-0:2.18.8-1.redhat_00003.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jboss-remoting-0:5.0.31-3.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-jboss-server-migration-0:1.10.0-46.Final_redhat_00044.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-netty-0:4.1.135-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-netty-transport-native-epoll-0:4.1.135-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-picketlink-bindings-0:2.5.5-30.SP12_redhat_00020.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-picketlink-federation-0:2.5.5-24.SP12_redhat_00016.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-undertow-0:2.2.40-2.SP3_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7RedHateap7-wildfly-0:7.4.25-2.GA_redhat_00001.1.el7eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1RedHatbcpg-jdk15on*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1RedHatbcpg-jdk18on*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8RedHateap8-bouncycastle-0:1.84.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el8eap*
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9RedHateap8-bouncycastle-0:1.84.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el9eap*
BouncycastleUbuntuesm-apps/xenial*
BouncycastleUbuntuquesting*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References