CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-40984

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Jun 09, 2026 | Modified: Aug 06, 2026
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.5 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

In Micrometer, it is possible for a user to provide specially crafted HTTP requests that may cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.

Affected versions: micrometer-core 1.16.0 through 1.16.5; 1.15.0 through 1.15.11; 1.14.0 through 1.14.15; 1.13.0 through 1.13.18; 1.9.0 through 1.9.17. micrometer-jetty11 1.16.0 through 1.16.5; 1.15.0 through 1.15.11; 1.14.0 through 1.14.15; 1.13.0 through 1.13.18. micrometer-jetty12 1.16.0 through 1.16.5; 1.15.0 through 1.15.11; 1.14.0 through 1.14.15; 1.13.0 through 1.13.18.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1.P1 for Spring Boot 3.5.16RedHatmicrometer-core*
Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.18 for Quarkus 3.33RedHatmicrometer-core*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6RedHatrhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle:26.6.5-1*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6RedHatrhbk/keycloak-rhel9:26.6-11*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6RedHatrhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator:26.6-11*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5RedHatmicrometer-core*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5RedHatrhbk/keycloak-rhel9*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5RedHatrhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5RedHatrhbk-openshift-rhel9/rhbk-openshift-rhel9*
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.5RedHatrhbk-rhel9-operator/rhbk-rhel9-operator*
Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.2RedHatmicrometer-core*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References