CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-44173

Incorrect Authorization

Published: Jun 12, 2026 | Modified: Jul 02, 2026
CVSS 3.x
5.3
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
8.1 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

MariaDB server is a community developed fork of MySQL server. From versions 10.6.1 to before 10.6.26, 10.11.1 to before 10.11.17, 11.4.1 to before 11.4.11, 11.8.1 to before 11.8.7, and 12.3.1, MariaDB allowed SELECT … INTO OUTFILE and SELECT … INTO DUMPFILE without verifying the FILE privilege if the FROM clause contained only subqueries. This issue has been patched in versions 10.6.26, 10.11.17, 11.4.11, 11.8.7, and 12.3.2.

Weakness

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
MariadbMariadb10.6.1 (including)10.6.26 (excluding)
MariadbMariadb10.11.1 (including)10.11.17 (excluding)
MariadbMariadb11.4.1 (including)11.4.11 (excluding)
MariadbMariadb11.8.1 (including)11.8.7 (excluding)
MariadbMariadb12.3.1 (including)12.3.1 (including)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10RedHatmariadb10.11-3:10.11.18-1.el10_2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10RedHatgalera-0:26.4.27-1.el10_2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10RedHatmariadb11.8-3:11.8.8-1.el10_2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatmariadb:10.11-8100020260616102001.489197e6*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatmariadb:11.8-9080020260612104015.rhel9*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatmariadb:10.11-9080020260612103452.rhel9*
Red Hat Hardened ImagesRedHatmariadb11-8-main-11.8.8-1.hum1*
Red Hat Hardened ImagesRedHatmariadb10-11-main-10.11.18-1.hum1*

Potential Mitigations

  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.

References