CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-44496

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Published: Jun 11, 2026 | Modified: Jul 02, 2026
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.5 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Axios versions before 0.32.0 on the 0.x line and before 1.16.0 on the 1.x line build a regular expression from the configured XSRF cookie name without escaping regex metacharacters. In standard browser environments, an attacker who can influence the cookie name passed to axios can cause expensive regex backtracking while axios reads document.cookie. The practical impact is client-side availability degradation, such as freezing the affected browser tab while axios prepares a request. The issue does not affect ordinary Node.js HTTP adapter usage, React Native, or web workers, where axios does not read document.cookie. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0.

Weakness

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
AxiosAxios*0.32.0 (excluding)
AxiosAxios1.0.0 (including)1.16.0 (excluding)
Multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8RedHatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1782157085*
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.13RedHatrhacm2/console-rhel9:1782157514*
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10RedHatadvanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1779293013*
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9RedHatadvanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1779371594*
Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9RedHatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1781187342*
Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9RedHatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1782761244*
Red Hat Discovery 2RedHatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:1782166952*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15RedHatopenshift4/ose-console:1782127091*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16RedHatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:1782244020*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20RedHatopenshift4/ose-monitoring-plugin-rhel9:1781695012*
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21RedHatopenshift4/ose-monitoring-plugin-rhel9:1781731914*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel8:1781937133*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel8:1782287580*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel9:1782201894*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:1782201833*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel9:1782201696*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:1782201537*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel9:1782201851*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:1782201812*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel9:1782231869*
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3RedHatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:1782201466*
Red Hat Quay 3.10RedHatquay/quay-rhel8:1782487717*
Red Hat Quay 3.12RedHatquay/quay-rhel8:1781937357*
Red Hat Quay 3.9RedHatquay/quay-rhel8:1781878070*
Node-axiosUbuntuupstream*

Potential Mitigations

  • Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:

  • The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.

  • The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute – and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.

References