CVE-2026-46022

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

misc: ibmasm: fix OOB MMIO read in ibmasm_handle_mouse_interrupt()

ibmasm_handle_mouse_interrupt() performs an out-of-bounds MMIO read when the queue reader or writer index from hardware exceeds REMOTE_QUEUE_SIZE (60).

A compromised service processor can trigger this by writing an out-of-range value to the reader or writer MMIO register before asserting an interrupt. Since writer is re-read from hardware on every loop iteration, it can also be set to an out-of-range value after the loop has already started.

The root cause is that get_queue_reader() and get_queue_writer() return raw readl() values that are passed directly into get_queue_entry(), which computes:

queue_begin + reader * sizeof(struct remote_input)

with no bounds check. This unchecked MMIO address is then passed to memcpy_fromio(), reading 8 bytes from unintended device registers. For sufficiently large values the address falls outside the PCI BAR mapping entirely, triggering a machine check exception.

Fix by checking both indices against REMOTE_QUEUE_SIZE at the top of the loop body, before any call to get_queue_entry(). On an out-of-range value, reset the reader register to 0 via set_queue_reader() before breaking, so that normal queue operation can resume if the corrupted hardware state is transient.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

Potential Mitigations

• Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
• When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
• Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
• To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

Related Attack Patterns

• https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/540.html

References

• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07c4f18b303106e6b24492c12b95d48a4b985841
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ca75f6b74ec7f685464e5745ecfcf3a76d284e9
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22a16d3eafee92a165c756081587c95850127107
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b6e6ead556734bdc14024c5f837132b1e7a4b84
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f6ecc9153df176e956d0664b56f93080b0a45f0
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bac8643486f854dd53af9b23aea7dbbd9b7c1865
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7e5b4eefd7be3e09f8bd5fee63ed478fd7446ab
• https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc7e9a74e32299d7e93e178ca482a0b59ef1595b