A inconsistency in Node.js hostname matching can cause a trust-policy bypass in multi-context mTLS setups.
This vulnerability affects all supported release lines: Node.js 22, Node.js 24, and Node.js 26.
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
| Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node.js | Nodejs | 22.22.3 (including) | 22.22.3 (including) |
| Node.js | Nodejs | 24.16.0 (including) | 24.16.0 (including) |
| Node.js | Nodejs | 26.3.0 (including) | 26.3.0 (including) |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | RedHat | nodejs24-1:24.18.0-1.el10_2 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | RedHat | nodejs22-1:22.23.1-2.el10_2 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | RedHat | nodejs:24-9080020260626074955.rhel9 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | RedHat | nodejs:22-9080020260626075442.rhel9 | * |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | RedHat | nodejs26-main-26.4.0-1.3.hum1 | * |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | RedHat | nodejs24-main-24.18.0-0.2.hum1 | * |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | RedHat | nodejs22-main-22.23.1-2.hum1 | * |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | RedHat | nodejs25-main-25.9.0-1.1.hum1 | * |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | RedHat | nodejs20-main-20.20.2-1.hum1 | * |
| Nodejs | Ubuntu | questing | * |
Access control involves the use of several protection mechanisms such as:
When any mechanism is not applied or otherwise fails, attackers can compromise the security of the product by gaining privileges, reading sensitive information, executing commands, evading detection, etc. There are two distinct behaviors that can introduce access control weaknesses: