Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to version 9.2.0565, the update_snapshot() function in src/terminal.c copies the visible terminal screen into the scrollback buffer when a snapshot is taken. For each screen cell it walks the cells chars[] array with no upper bound, stopping only when it encounters a NUL terminator. When a cell legitimately fills all VTERM_MAX_CHARS_PER_CELL (6) slots — a base character plus five combining marks — the bundled libvterm returns the array without a terminating NUL, so the loop reads past the fixed six-element array and appends the out-of-bounds values to a buffer reserved for only six characters. A program whose output is rendered inside a :terminal window can trigger this with a short byte sequence and no Vim scripting, leading to a crash. This issue has been patched in version 9.2.0565.
Weakness
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Affected Software
| Name | Vendor | Start Version | End Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vim | Vim | * | 9.2.0565 (excluding) |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | RedHat | vim-2:9.1.083-9.el10_2.20 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | RedHat | vim-2:8.0.1763-31.el8_10.7 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | RedHat | vim-2:8.0.1763-31.el8_10.7 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | RedHat | vim-2:8.2.2637-26.el9_8.21 | * |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | RedHat | vim-2:8.2.2637-26.el9_8.21 | * |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | RedHat | vim-main-9.2.967-1.1.hum1 | * |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | RedHat | rhui5/cds-kubernetes-rhel9:1789479916 | * |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | RedHat | rhui5/cds-rhel9:1789479900 | * |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | RedHat | rhui5/haproxy-rhel9:1789479891 | * |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | RedHat | rhui5/installer-rhel9:1789482961 | * |
| Vim | Ubuntu | esm-infra/bionic | * |
| Vim | Ubuntu | esm-infra/focal | * |
| Vim | Ubuntu | jammy | * |
| Vim | Ubuntu | noble | * |
| Vim | Ubuntu | questing | * |
| Vim | Ubuntu | resolute | * |
Potential Mitigations
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.